|
|
| Event | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
| Budburst | 1st/2nd wk Mar | 2nd wk Feb | 4th wk Feb | <1st wk Mar | 1st wk Mar |
| Flowering | 4th wk Apr | 1st/2nd wk Apr | unknown | ~3rd wk Apr | 1st wk Apr |
| Fruit set | 3rd wk May | May/Jun | unknown | unknown | 3rd wk Apr |
| Veraison | July | ~mid-Jun | 4th wk Jun | 2nd-4th wk Jul | 1st-3rd wk Jul |
| Harvest | 12th Aug | 21st Aug | 6,8th Aug | - damn birds! | 1st Sep |
| Yield (g/plant) | 647 | 356 | 2949 | - | 1648 |
| Average berry weight (g) | 2.5 | 2.2 | 2.4 | - | 2.5 |
| Leafdrop | late Nov (~90%) | unknown | 2nd wk Oct (99%) | 1st wk Dec (99%) | unknown |
| Pruning regime | - | none | 12th Dec, leaders to 1/2 length, laterals ~1 bud | none | 14th Jan, severe |
Birds
In the past, some fruit stripping by birds had been experienced and fruiting branches were trained/raised higher to avoid this. Netting was typically avoided, however, so as to give the fruit the maximum possible sunlight exposure.
Unfortunately, all the fruit from the (unnetted) 2004 season was eaten by birds while away on holidays for a few days. Netting was therefore used during the last few weeks of the 2005 vintage. This further allowed harvest to be delayed by almost a month later than had been typical in the past.
Notes on yield
The 2005 yield was down significantly on 2003 figures, though average berry weight was up on previous years. Both these attributes are considered to be the result of increased vegetative growth, since no pruning followed the 2004 season.
Notes on maturity and flavour development
The harvested berries were very mature, with extended hang time being pushed into September. It is clear, however, that extended hang time in gooseberries results in increased berry-drop and decreased flavours in remaining bush-attached berries. A reasonable compromise was probably made in 2005 between flavour loss and astringency/acidity loss, with berries showing softer acidity and astringency yet "ripe" flavours of reasonable intensity.
Windfalls showed less flavour, but softer astringency and acidity than bush-attached berries. Some windfalls also appeared to have picked up earthy flavours. (Of course, these berries were not included in the collected harvest.) Bush-attached berries which showed shrivelling at harvest also possessed less flavour, but softer astringency and acidity. Smaller sized berries generally showed higher levels of astringency/acid.
|